A “green lease” is one that seeks to encourage sustainable practices by both the landlord and the tenant and to remove disincentives to increased recycling, reduced raw material, energy and water consumption, as well as the use of sustainable materials in tenant improvements. Ensuring that tenants and landlords are required or strongly encouraged to adopt environmentally friendly practices is the purpose of such a lease. One commercial landlord oriented green lease* states its objectives this way:
The Tenant acknowledges the Landlord’s intention to operate the Building so as to provide for:
(a) a comfortable, productive and healthy indoor environment;
(b) reduced energy use and reduced production, both direct and indirect, of Greenhouse Gases;
(c) reduced use of potable water and the use of recycled water where appropriate;
(d) the effective diversion of construction, demolition, and land-clearing waste from landfill and incineration disposal, and the recycling of tenant waste streams;
(e) the use of cleaning products certified in accordance with EcoLogoM (Canada), Green SealTM (United States) or equivalent standards;
(f) the facilitation of alternate transportation options for individuals attending at the Building; and
(g) the avoidance of high volatile organic compound materials, furniture and improvements within the Building and individual tenant premises.
The lease goes on to specify how this is to be done, the related responsibility of each party, the metrics and methods to measure compliance, the allocation of related costs, and how it is to be enforced.
* The lease, entitled “REALpac National Standard Green Office Lease for Single-Building Projects – 1.01 – 2008,” was developed by the Real Property Association of Canada, and can be seen in its entirety at
http://designersi.com/users/12415/downloads/NSGOL_Single_Version1.01clean_
Released01June08.pdf.
COMING NEXT: How do most leases now discourage being green?
With over 35 years experience Stu Heller helps his clients understand and improve their business and real estate transactions. His blogs on leasing can be found on Blogspot, WordPress, Squidoo and Hubpages, and his “Superb” attorney rating and profile on AVVO.com. He is an allied member of the Washington Restaurant and the Washington State Hotel & Lodging associations, as well as a member of the King County and Washington State bar associations. Contact him for a free initial consultation or to get his Legal Tips emailed to you or others you work with. Be sure to consult your lawyer before applying any of the above to a particular situation. Contact info: Stuart A. Heller, 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 940, Seattle, WA 98101, 206-623-0579, fax 206-682-7972, heller@theleasinglawyer.com, hellerlaw@aol.com, www.theleasinglawyer.com. ©2009, Stuart A. Heller, all rights reserved.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Saturday, February 28, 2009
LEED and Being GREEN
What does LEED® have to do with being Green?
LEED is the acronym for “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.” It is best known for its rating system put together by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) to determine how “green” the design, construction and operation of allegedly green buildings are. The Council intends it to encourage and accelerate global adoption of sustainable green building and development practices through the creation and implementation of universally understood and accepted tools and performance criteria. It is also intended to give building owners and operators the tools they need to have an immediate and measurable impact on their buildings’ “green” performance. LEED promotes a whole-building approach to sustainability by recognizing performance in five key areas of human and environmental health: sustainable site development, water savings, energy efficiency, materials selection and indoor environmental quality.
According to the USGBC web site [http://www.usgbc.org/displaypage.aspx?CMsPageID=222] “architects, real estate professionals, facility managers, engineers, interior designers, landscape architects, construction managers, lenders and government officials all use LEED to help transform the built environment to sustainability. State and local governments across the country are adopting LEED for public-owned and public-funded buildings; there are LEED initiatives in federal agencies, including the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, Energy, and State; and LEED projects are in progress in 41 different countries, including Canada, Brazil, Mexico and India.”
LEED Rating Systems are said to be developed through an open, consensus-based process led by LEED committees composed of a diverse group of volunteer practitioners and experts representing a cross-section of the building and construction industry. Among others there are now LEED rating systems for new construction, existing buildings, commercial interiors, schools, retail and healthcare structures, homes and neighborhood development. To earn LEED certification, a project must satisfy all prerequisites and earn a minimum number of points outlined in the LEED Rating System under which it is registered.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Why Do You Want A Broad Right To Assign
Mr. Jones’ company is bound by an agreement that is vital to the operation of his business. It could be a space or equipment lease, or some sort of financing, supplier or service agreement. The agreement says that its transfer or assignment is prohibited or permitted only with the other party’s approval. Consider these situations: (i) his business is doing very well and he wants to sell it or its assets while they are most valuable, (ii) his business is doing poorly and he wants to get out by selling it or its assets, (iii) for accounting, management or other purposes he wants to transfer the agreement to another company he owns, a subsidiary or parent company, or to merge his company with another, or (iv) he wants to bring in a few other investors or take his company public.
In all these cases Mr. Jones’ ability to transfer the agreement can be a critical factor in whether he succeeds. A buyer might not be interested in the company or its assets if it cannot take advantage of the agreement. The other transfers might not be possible if the agreement labels them as prohibited assignments or as ones requiring the consent of the other party, either of which occurs frequently in agreements proposed by the other party. Unless these issues are properly dealt with during negotiation of the agreement Mr. Jones could have a big problem. What could he have done?
One solution would have been to define some of some of the activities as not included in the definition of “assignment.” This can sometimes be achieved for transfers to a parent or subsidiary of Mr. Jones’ company, transfers that do not result in a change in the control of his company, or for transfers to or a merger with a company owned or controlled by Mr. Jones.
Another solution would have been to set criteria which if met by the intended transferee would permit the transfer without first having to obtain the other party’s consent. An example would be where the transferee has a specified net worth or at least a net worth greater than Mr. Jones company’s at the time of the transfer, and also has a specified number years of experience in Mr. Jones’ company’s business. Satisfying these criteria could provide comfort to the party on the other side of the agreement that it will be doing business with a responsible and qualified replacement for Mr. Jones.
Even if the desired transfer is allowed Mr. Jones could still be concerned about whether his company will remain liable for his replacement’s compliance with the agreement. That will be the subject of one of my future Legal Briefs.
With over 35 years experience Stu Heller helps his clients understand and improve their business and real estate transactions. His website is at www.theleasinglawyer.com. He can be reached at 206-623-0579 and hellerlaw@aol.com. Contact him for a free initial consultation. Be sure to consult your lawyer before applying any of the above to a particular situation.
In all these cases Mr. Jones’ ability to transfer the agreement can be a critical factor in whether he succeeds. A buyer might not be interested in the company or its assets if it cannot take advantage of the agreement. The other transfers might not be possible if the agreement labels them as prohibited assignments or as ones requiring the consent of the other party, either of which occurs frequently in agreements proposed by the other party. Unless these issues are properly dealt with during negotiation of the agreement Mr. Jones could have a big problem. What could he have done?
One solution would have been to define some of some of the activities as not included in the definition of “assignment.” This can sometimes be achieved for transfers to a parent or subsidiary of Mr. Jones’ company, transfers that do not result in a change in the control of his company, or for transfers to or a merger with a company owned or controlled by Mr. Jones.
Another solution would have been to set criteria which if met by the intended transferee would permit the transfer without first having to obtain the other party’s consent. An example would be where the transferee has a specified net worth or at least a net worth greater than Mr. Jones company’s at the time of the transfer, and also has a specified number years of experience in Mr. Jones’ company’s business. Satisfying these criteria could provide comfort to the party on the other side of the agreement that it will be doing business with a responsible and qualified replacement for Mr. Jones.
Even if the desired transfer is allowed Mr. Jones could still be concerned about whether his company will remain liable for his replacement’s compliance with the agreement. That will be the subject of one of my future Legal Briefs.
With over 35 years experience Stu Heller helps his clients understand and improve their business and real estate transactions. His website is at www.theleasinglawyer.com. He can be reached at 206-623-0579 and hellerlaw@aol.com. Contact him for a free initial consultation. Be sure to consult your lawyer before applying any of the above to a particular situation.
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Free Consultation
Contact me at 206-623-0579 for a free half hour consultation on the proposed commercial lease you are asked to sign.
DISCLAIMER
Disclaimer Details
I am providing the content on this blog solely for the reader’s general information. This blog contains my personal commentary on issues that interest me. This is NOT a newspaper; it’s a BLOG. Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this blog are mine alone, and not the views of any law firm with which I am in any way associated or any other member of any such law firm. Nothing on this blog is intended to be a solicitation of, or the provision of, legal advice, nor to create an attorney-client relationship with me or any law firm. You should seek professional legal counsel authorized to practice law in your jurisdiction before acting on any information contained on this blog. I expressly disclaim any and all liability of any kind or nature with respect to any act or omission based wholly or in part in reliance on anything contained on this blog. I am not licensed to render advice except in the state of Washington, and I do not offer legal services to the residents of any jurisdiction where it would be prohibited for me to do so.
Any links that appear on this blog are purely for your information. I’m not making any representations as to their content or, in fact, any other matter concerning them. Merely because a link to a third party site appears on this site doesn’t mean that I have reviewed the site an approve it or its content. I don’t control any such third party sites and I’m not responsible for their actions, omissions or content. Follow all links at your own risk. If you access any third party site linked to this site or acquire any goods or services from any such third party, you do so at your own risk. I disclaim any liability for any reason connected with any such third party, its site or any goods or services advertised by or ordered or acquired from any such third party.
Communication
You may not form an attorney-client relationship with me by the use of this blog, leaving comments to any post, or sending me an e-mail. An attorney-client relationship with me can be established only by entering into a written engagement agreement signed by me. If you do not have an existing attorney-client relationship with me, do not send confidential information to me by e-mail links found on this site or by any other means unless you are authorized to do so by me. Such communication will not be subject to attorney-client privilege. If you have an attorney-client relationship with me, information that you send to me within the scope of that relationship will be handled in accordance with the applicable Rules of Professional Conduct. However, please be aware that if you send to me any such information by e-mail that is not encrypted, you accept the risk of interception, loss, corruption or lack of confidentiality.
If you do not have an attorney-client relationship with me, I may post to this blog or otherwise use all or any portion of any e-mail, voice mail or other communication you make with me including, without limitation, any personally identifiable information that you send to me for any purpose I may deem appropriate in my sole discretion.
I am not obligated to respond to any e-mail sent to me through this blog or to any comment left on this blog and I disclaim any liability for failing to respond to any e-mail or comment generated by this blog.
Changes
I may change this Disclaimer in whole or in part at any time and from time to time, without notice, by means of, and effective upon, posting the revised Disclaimer to this page. Last update to this page was made on December 20, 2008.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
LEASING COMMERCIAL SPACE AS A TENANT: PART EIGHT
“SUBORDINATION” AND “NONDISTURBANCE”
When the landlord insists that you agree to allow its lender to subordinate your lease to the lender’s lien, that is, to make the lender’s rights superior to yours, insist on a Anondisturbance” provision requiring the landlord to provide you with an agreement from its lender that if the lender takes over the property it and any of its successors will continue to respect your lease rights so long as you satisfy your lease obligations.
When the landlord insists that you agree to allow its lender to subordinate your lease to the lender’s lien, that is, to make the lender’s rights superior to yours, insist on a Anondisturbance” provision requiring the landlord to provide you with an agreement from its lender that if the lender takes over the property it and any of its successors will continue to respect your lease rights so long as you satisfy your lease obligations.
LEASING COMMERCIAL SPACE AS A TENANT: PART SEVEN
IMPROVE THE “ESTOPPEL” CERTIFICATE PROVISION
You may be required to provide an “estoppel” certificate or letter at the demand of the landlord. In it you must state whether certain things about your leasehold relationship are true, such as whether the landlord is in default, the rent has been paid more than one month in advance, and whether and if so how the lease has been amended since it was originally signed. It is intended to be relied on by a third party such as a bank or purchaser. Have a qualified attorney review it because the third party can come after you later if your statements are untrue. Specify that your statements are made only “to the best of your current knowledge and belief.” You might try to get the landlord to promise to provide you with a similar statement or certificate which you can give to your lender when you are trying to refinance your furniture, fixtures, equipment or tenant improvement loan.
You may be required to provide an “estoppel” certificate or letter at the demand of the landlord. In it you must state whether certain things about your leasehold relationship are true, such as whether the landlord is in default, the rent has been paid more than one month in advance, and whether and if so how the lease has been amended since it was originally signed. It is intended to be relied on by a third party such as a bank or purchaser. Have a qualified attorney review it because the third party can come after you later if your statements are untrue. Specify that your statements are made only “to the best of your current knowledge and belief.” You might try to get the landlord to promise to provide you with a similar statement or certificate which you can give to your lender when you are trying to refinance your furniture, fixtures, equipment or tenant improvement loan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
